Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Jun 15 22:22:44 UTC 2009
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>> It's not about the upgrade process. It is only about compare_providers.
>>>
>>> You have 3 pkgs providing 'foo'
>>>
>>> foo-1.1.noarch
>>> foo-1.0.x86_64
>>> foo-1.0.i386
>>>
>>> Which one do you pick on x86_64 or i686?
>>>
>>> We weight extra toward pkgs in the same arch as the running system. And
>>> then the arch NEAREST to the running arch.
>>
>> Maybe I'm just being naive, but I'd expect a newer EVR to trump any arch
>> weighting.
>
> really?
>
> So if you're on x86_64
>
> and you have foo-1.1.i386 and foo-1.0.x86_64
>
> and you run:
>
> yum install foo
>
> you would expect foo-1.1.i386 to be installed instead of foo-1.0.x86_64?
>
> REALLY?
Yes, really, imo, ymmv, and all that.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list