Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
Gregory Maxwell
gmaxwell at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 17:58:31 UTC 2009
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Bill Nottingham<notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Given the loud feedback, I've updated the proposal at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support
>
> The revised proposal:
>
> - Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov)
> - Optimize for Atom
>
> Why?
>
> - We don't really support i586 in any meaningful matter
> - OLPC still works with base i686
> - We are likely doing a mass rebuild for F-12 anyways, might as well switch
> while we're doing it
> - Atom is the only currently produced 32-bit x86 chip of note; optimize
> for what's currently available
>
> If you want numbers, I did some benchmarking of code [1] with various
> build options on a variety of processors, with the F-11 gcc code. All
> of these results are relative to a F-11 baseline of "-march=i586
> -mtune=generic".
>
> P4 2.4Ghz Athlon 3400+ Core2Duo E6850 Atom N270
> march=i686/ -1.1% +2.0% +0.9% +0.6%
> mtune=generic
> march=i586/ +0.3% -0.3% -0.2% +1.3%
> mtune=atom
> march=i686/ -1.5% +1.2% +0.5% +1.7%
> mtune=atom
If there is a mass rebuild…
Consider:
-Os on the x86 build?
-O3 on x86_64?
(Back in 2007 I would have screamed loudly that the auto-vectorizer
produces broken code; but today it appears to work fine.)
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list