Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
Jon Ciesla
limb at jcomserv.net
Tue Jun 16 11:59:50 UTC 2009
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?
>>>>>
>>>> Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL
>>>> customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386
>>>> would still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a
>>>> secondary arch in Fedora. . .
>>>
>>> This is not relevant for fedora's decisions.
>>>
>>> -sv
>>>
>> I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat
>> decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in
>> making that a primary arch?
>>
>
> I'm saying since rhel goals and guidelines are not public knowledge we
> cannot go guessing at them and it is not relevant for what fedora
> needs to do.
>
> -sv
>
Fair enough.
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list