PLEASE READ: provenpackager reseed

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:47:08AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Oliver Falk (oliver at linux-kernel.at) said: 
>>> Well. Here's my mail. As secondary arch maintainer (alpha), I'd like to  
>>> be added to the provenpackager group - of course...
>> Assuming the alpha team has a full normal secondary arch group (and you're
>> in it), you shouldn't need provenpackager access.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better if secondary arch group member gained their rights
> through the provenpackager process, instead of through another process?
> 
> And same for releng, security, and QA members?
> 
There was a meeting at one point (I think FESCo but I could be wrong)
where the cvsadmin groups was given responsibility for putting new
members in cvsadmin.  I believe that this technically covers all the
groups except secondary arches -- who have the same powers but different
groups and different responsibilities.

Just pointing out the history; not necessarily what should be.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090310/5319d46a/attachment.sig>