Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide!

Martin Sourada martin.sourada at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 17:27:33 UTC 2009


On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 13:06 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:49:10PM +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 03:18 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > A note to all Fedora maintainers and especially to the Red Hat people
> > > who are involved in development every day:
> > > 
> > >            Please fix your bugs [1] in the release they were
> > >          filed against instead of just closing them NEXTRELASE!
> > > 
> > > I know it sounds slinky to just close everything NEXTRELEASE and I know
> > > I sucks to get reports of bugs you've already fixed. But in 99% of all
> > > cases it shouldn't be to hard to get the fix also into the stable
> > > release.
> > > 
> > Hm... I am getting confused here. I thought NEXTRELEASE relates to
> > package release not distro release, whereas RAWHIDE is what is supposed
> > to be used when fixed in rawhide... At least one of us definitely needs
> > to be wrong...
> 
> If that were the case, then CURRENTRELEASE would make no sense.
> 
Indeed... That sort of slipped my attention. Makes sense.

Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090310/5160686f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list