Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide!

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 19:10 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html
> > > >
> > > > How did you find that?  I was looking for it, but couldn't find it
> > > > linked from anywhere.
> > > 
> > > It's linked, at least, in the word "Status" at the bottom of each bug,
> > > next to the drop-down where you would set the status.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow
> > RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we
> > don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora
> > flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that
> > page in Bugzilla.
> 
> The Fedora bug flow is defined here:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
> 
> Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for
> the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki.

Hehe. I was actually going to link to that page and then didn't, for two
reasons:

1) as you say, it fudges the CLOSED resolutions anyway
2) it's being revised (we're working on it today) since NEEDINFO isn't a
status these days.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net