autoconf and epel-5

[Callum Lerwick]

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:05 +0100, yersinia wrote:
> 
> Perhaps off topic. Someone know the prons/cons of scons 
> 
> http://www.scons.org/? 
> My first impression is that it is very similar to cmake as design
> phylosophy, but use only phyton on the target system and this a plus,
> IMHO. 

No, despite hype leading you to believe otherwise, SCons is not in the
same class as autotools or CMake. SCons is only marginally better than
hand-hacking makefiles. I can't recommend it.

I speak from experience with the Second Life client. SCons got changed
out for CMake for good reason...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090302/a6f9ba74/attachment.sig>