yum-builddep pulling in i386 packages for x86_64 -devel dependencies

[Tom Lane]

"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa at redhat.com> writes:
> On 03/06/2009 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If true, this is completely horrid --- this means every single package I
>> own is broken, and probably 75% of everything else is too.  Can't we get
>> this fixed in RPM, rather than having to kluge it in the specfiles?

> RPM already tracks architecture for detected library dependencies. This
> really only comes into play for BuildRequires that could reasonably be
> multilib and any hardcoded library requires. So, not 75% of packages.
> More like 2%.

That doesn't make me feel better unless there's some pretty clear rule
for figuring out which packages are the 2%.  Right at the moment it
seems to me that *any* BuildRequires is vulnerable, because a SRPM by
definition has no library dependencies.  Please explain why it's not.

			regards, tom lane