Should bluez be in base, or split deps?

[psmith]

drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, psmith <johnsmithdoe14 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>     
>>> Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) said:
>>>       
>>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome. �I thought shortest wins,
>>>>> or is this an epoch thing?
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> AFAIK, bluez-gnome is obsoleted by gnome-bluetooth, which has a longer
>>>> name
>>>> than kdebluetooth.
>>>>
>>>>         
>> are you saying that packages that provide the same functionality are chosen
>> to install by which has the shorter name?
>>     
>
> yes that's how it work.
>
>   
wow, that just seems so archaic!