rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.7, 1.8
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 13:17:25 UTC 2009
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:13:11 +0100, Christoph wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 09:36 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> >
> > I wonder why this spec file creates a virtual -devel subpackage with a
> > lower Epoch and higher version
>
> because of the downgrade
Let me rephrase:
Previous package build: 0.36-1
This update: 1:0.22-2
Why is the -devel subpackage 0:0.35 as I quoted?
The 0.36-1 release already did:
Obsoletes: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel < 0.35
Provides: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel = 0.35
With a downgrade to 1:0.22, -devel goes from 0.35 to 0:0.35?
(no Epoch and explicit zero Epoch doesn't make a different, btw)
> > and why there is no API for that -devel
> > pkg included?
>
> because the maintainer has dropped the -devel package again.
Why the "Provides" then?
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list