rpms/claws-mail-plugins/devel claws-mail-plugins.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.19, 1.20 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 10:14:58 UTC 2009
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/claws-mail-plugins/devel claws-mail-plugins.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.19, 1.20 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20
- Next message (by thread): rpms/claws-mail-plugins/devel claws-mail-plugins.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.19, 1.20 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:49:16 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
> >> %lang(pt_BR) %{_datadir}/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/archive.mo
> >> %lang(ru) %{_datadir}/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/archive.mo
> >> +%lang(nl) %{_datadir}/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/archive.mo
> >
> > The spec file doesn't explain why %find_lang is not used.
> > Why isn't it used?
> >
>
> I cannot find the review request or the merge review for
> this package (on redhat bugzilla). I guess this package was
> imported from fedora.us or so (I don't know well about that
> era).
%find_lang has been recommended/preferred long ago, too, except
that fedora.us has fought with keeping the QA check-list rather
shorter than longer.
Fedora Package Review is this (using its old upstream name):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/165910
Initially, it didn't contain .mo files:
$ cvs co -r sylpheed-claws-plugins-1_9_13-3 sylpheed-claws-plugins/devel
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/claws-mail-plugins/devel claws-mail-plugins.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.19, 1.20 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20
- Next message (by thread): rpms/claws-mail-plugins/devel claws-mail-plugins.spec, 1.39, 1.40 sources, 1.19, 1.20 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list