The Great Pulseaudio Mixer Debate: a modest (productive) proposal
Callum Lerwick
seg at haxxed.com
Sun May 3 17:56:32 UTC 2009
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 21:12 +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/29/2009 08:21 AM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:59 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> >>> Subject: Re: The Great Pulseaudio Mixer Debate: a
> >> modest (productive)
> >>> proposal
> >>> From: Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com>
> >>> To: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> >>> Date: 04/27/2009 10:12 AM
> >>>
> >>>> I've had X lock up or temporarily freeze and
> >> kaffeine
> >>>> (playing through PA via xine) still plays. The only
> >> way
> >>>> I've been able to get it to skip is to force
> >> basically
> >>>> everything into swap with programs that take up 3+GB
> >> of
> >>>> RAM (making markov chains from big.txt takes...quite
> >> a
> >>>> bit in duck-typed languages). Maybe it's the dual
> >> core
> >>>> 3.0GHz, but I've found it hard to skip apps using
> >> PA.
> >>>> PA is taking 0% CPU and kaffeine jumps to 1% playing
> >>>> flac files. Also, PA hasn't even jumped towards the
> >> top
> >>>> of usage at all in the past few minutes.
> >>>
> >>> That's amazing, because I have a 3ghz dual core and
> >> PA takes ~10% CPU to
> >>> play FLAC from Rhythmbox and can skip if I'm doing a
> >> lot of work - say
> >>> ffmpeg transcoding and moving files. Intel HD audio
> >> (yes, generic)
> >>> Analog Devices chip.
> >>>
> >> Maybe its a difference between xine and gstreamer?
> >>
> >> % lspci | grep -i audio
> >> 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10
> >> Family) HD Audio Controller
> >
> > Check your logs. This is quite possibly the difference between "My
> > hardware does 44.1khz natively" and "My hardware only does 48000khz and
> > playing anything but a DVD requires resampling". Later Intel chipsets
> > all seem to be the latter.
> >
> Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but I also have a huge
> CPU hit on my 4+ year old laptop, and I am sure that it handles
> different sampling rates without much difficulty.
>
> So, my question is, what logs can I check to find out if this is
> happening (if I understood the message correctly)?
Hrm, pulseaudio's logging seems to have changed. You can try running
"pulseaudio -k;pulseaudio -v" then dig through the spew:
I: alsa-util.c: Device hw:M5455,0 doesn't support 44100 Hz, changed to
48000 Hz.
I: alsa-sink.c: Successfully opened device hw:M5455,0.
If you see something like that, your hardware requires resampling.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090503/df6f6331/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list