182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 05/08/2009 08:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:

> 
> Yeah, I haven't put a lot of effort into such a thing myself.  It'd be
> far easier if we didn't have multiple active releases at any time, or
> didn't allow version bumps in N-* releases.  Of course, those are even
> more "flamey" topics.

If we don't maintain two general releases in parallel, we are cutting
short to a six month release *and* update cycle instead of a release
cycle of six months and update cycle of 13 months, approx. Do you have
an alternative?

Rahul