Fedora (Linux) is Destroying it self

[Ralf Corsepius]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:00:45PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:30:27PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> Everything? Maybe it escapes you, but it's always the same issue:
>>>
>>> When "upstream" == "@RH", common sense and rationality seems to be  
>>> switched off in Fedora.
>> Red Hat's not upstream to Fedora.
> 
> That's not what Ralf is saying.
Exactly.

 > RH is upstream for some packages or
> involved especially in upstream (for example, NetworkManager, hal, 
> consolekit, gdm, many gnome components...), and in that case it is 
> not rare that the corresponding packages end up in fedora releases
> although there are features that were present in previous components 
> that are not already ready, or the applications are not that well 
> tested as shown in rawhide testing.

You've got it - And named a few I have in mind, which I consider to be 
not to be not in a shape to base a distro on.