glibc fork ?

Thu May 7 18:05:06 UTC 2009

Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 17:05 +0200 schrieb Denis Leroy:
> http://www.eglibc.org/home
> 
> So are we moving to eglibc as well ? :-)
> 
> So what happened ? Overreaction from Debian guy, or poor community 
> management from RH guy ?

I've discussed this issue with some debian maintainers I work with. It
seems they all agree to UD not being a very comfortable upstream
maintainer.

The question is: What kind of thing does eglibc worse than glibc?
I mean it is smaller and compatible so there must be regressions, right?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090507/50719d34/attachment.sig>