182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Tim Waugh]

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For new packages, it's surely better to have a new crap package than
> no package at all.

When a package claims to do something but is actually no good at it, it
can cause real frustration to those who just want to use the computer
and not develop for it.

I would much rather the software that goes into a Fedora release be of
release quality, starting from the time the package review is finished,
or not be in it at all.

Is it just me?

Tim.
*/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090508/989667cf/attachment.sig>