[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OpenOffice 3.1

On 5/9/09, Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>  > Well, in this case updating F-10 3.1 properly would require updating a
>  > load of other stuff as well with all the risks and work that entails.
>  > But even if that wasn't the case I generally don't bump major versions
>  > of OOo in a released product. I see our fedora release cycle as ones of
>  > iterative stable complete releases, rather than one which has an
>  > always-open pool of stable packages which always contains the latest
>  > stable version of a package. i.e. F-10 was history as soon as it was
>  > released, and F-11 is likewise almost dead to me already :-) Not that I
>  > won't fix bugs in them, just that I don't see them as live development
>  > releases.
> I thank you for this!


IMHO, Fedora needs more maintainers who think of whole releases as
stable release sets.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]