182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?
Jud Craft
craftjml at gmail.com
Mon May 11 19:18:59 UTC 2009
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:35 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>> Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than
>> Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a
>> Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until
>> they've been in the newer Fedora first.
>
> Your suggest would lead to not allowing F10's package versions to /ever/
> be newer than what Fedora 11 ships with at GA.
>
Question!
Why not force them to be "N-V" older, then? Wouldn't that still allow
for security updates? (I assumed security updates were the
minor-point-number -R packages).
So in essence, the F9 packages are set in stone when F10 is released,
except for minor patches. No new versions.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list