Breaking deps deliberately
Orcan Ogetbil
oget.fedora at gmail.com
Thu May 14 22:00:33 UTC 2009
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/15/2009 03:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11
>>> update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11).
>>
>> Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1
>> versioning?
>
> Is that method documented anywhere?
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
... although I find it a bit weird to have this rule in the Naming Guidelines.
Orcan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list