Breaking deps deliberately

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 05/15/2009 03:30 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/15/2009 03:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>>> Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11
>>>> update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11).
>>> Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1
>>> versioning?
>> Is that method documented anywhere?
>>
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
> 
> ... although I find it a bit weird to have this rule in the Naming Guidelines.

I wasn't expecting it to be under naming guidelines either.

Would referring to it from

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO help?

Rahul