Online Docs group was: I must be doing something seriously wrong...

[David]

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
>
> There is an Online Docs group that has the -docs subpackage for many of
> the system-config-* packages.  It uses conditionals which are painful,
> but would be a way for more -docs subpackages to be visible, and if the
> user wishes to have local documentation, if available, for the packages
> they've chosen, they can pick that group.
>
> The group name is a bit... wrong, but maybe a group of people that care
> about documentation could help come up with a better name, and help to
> ensure that all the available -docs packages get listed in this group.

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:16 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>> Feel free to rename if you have a more suitable idea, though. If there
>> is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well.
>
> The existence of the group is fine, and it should probably grow.  The
> problem is the name.  "Online" at least here in the states means on the
> internet, so "Online Docs" would mean documents that your read via the
> Internet.  "Offline Docs" is almost more correct but still a bit
> awkward.  Anyway, I don't really have good suggestions.

Suggestions:
"Local Documentation"
"Local Help Documents"