gnaughty is a hot babe

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> It is not Fedora's place to police *usage* of apps, only whether the
> app
> or package has a compliant license and follows the defined packaging &
> legal rules. If the tool were directly containing support for decoding
> such prorietry formats that would be a different matter, because the 
> codecs would not pass the legal rules. 
> 

Then do you find it OK to package up a bunch of packages that provide
nothing but gnome or KDE menu entries that launch porn internet sites?
What about packages that add bookmarks for these in Firefox
(disregarding the fact that Firefox can only have one bookmarks package
at this point)?  Technically it's "free software", could be packaged
within the guidelines, and wouldn't be illegal on the surface, but is
this really acceptable things to distribute under the Fedora brand?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090529/3f04ca4d/attachment.sig>