Plans for tomorrow's (20090529) FESCo meeting

[John Poelstra]

Till Maas said the following on 05/29/2009 06:01 AM Pacific Time:
> On Fri May 29 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
>> I don't see a problem.
> 
> Imho outdated content reduces the quality of the wiki, therefore there should 
> be some garbage collection.
> 
>> If the Feature owner cares enough to keep proposing it, then FESCo will
>> keep reviewing it.  Technical items change over time.  Perhaps the
>> VirtualBox module will make it into the upstream kernel and the Feature
>> will be viable. Or perhaps a future FESCo will revist kmods.
> 
> Did you look at the content of the feature page? Even in the very unlikely 
> case that it may be included in Fedora in the future, Fedora will probably be 
> the last distribution to include it, so it is also very unlikely that it even 
> meats the Feature criteria. And if it does, there are only four sentences in 
> the Feature page, that were not in the template.
> 
> 
>> If the Feature owner doesn't care, then they can delete the page.  Either
>> way, I don't see what the problem is with having it sit in the
>> FeaturePageIncomplete category.
> 
> It seems more to me, that the Feature owner does not care, because the package 
> is very incomplete and I got no response from my comment in December 2008 that 
> Virtualbox won't make it into Fedora. Btw. how does the Feature owner delete 
> the page? It seems to me, that this is not easily possible using the wiki 
> interface.
> 

Try this :)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraProject:Deletion