rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 12:00 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Those aren't the same.  Since the addition of a new arch can break #2,
> how can packagers mean anything other than #1 by "noarch"? 

They can't, but it was a historical assumption that if you indicate #1,
you're implicitly indicating #2.  This has proven to break down as of
late, so we have to re-do the logic code around where a build can be
done.  It's no longer safe to assume that "noarch" means "anyarch".

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091104/2999241a/attachment.sig>