AM_SILENT_RULES

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Nov 5 15:17:17 UTC 2009


On 11/05/2009 04:04 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:43 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was looking at a package's build logs to see what kinds of problems gcc is
>> reporting for the code and found a lot of lines with "CC  object_name" and
>> nothing else. This is really not helpful when you scan koji build logs or look
>> for problems. Should we have a policy of requiring "--silent=no" configure
>> option for packages that are hiding gcc warnings?
Yes, definitely.

> GCC warnings will still show up, otherwise it means you don't have a
> high enough level of warnings in the package.
>
> V=1 passed to make is enough to show the full command-lines.
Unless a package already uses "V" otherwise.

> I don't think that disabling silent would help one bit if you're just
> looking for warnings, because it would show them anyway.
Wrong, Broken CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS don't show up as warning even when 
they kill a build.

Ralf





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list