GRUB2 In Fedora

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:58 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> > 
> > Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a
> > piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This isn't
> > a nice place to be in as a downstream.
> > 
> 
> And yet grub2 still doesn't have all the things we need it to have, that
> is in our grub, and seem to still not want our stuff yet.  Also not a
> great place to be as a downstream.

why don't we make it official that we're the new-old-grub upstream and
give it a shiny new name and a website? it's not like we're not the
upstream for half the rest of the stack, it'd hardly be a radical new
venture...

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net