Broken dependencies script at it again

[Mike McGrath]

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

>
>
> On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:
>
>       Tom Lane writes:
>
>             Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> writes:
>
>                   Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>
>                   altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
>
>                   breaks?
>
>             I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
>
>             that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
>
>
>       Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. 
>

Anyone on the list irritated enough to work on these scripts or just
irritated enough to complain via email and let it be someone else's
problem?

	-Mike