Improve the way rpm decides what is newer

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Nov 23 06:39:26 UTC 2009


On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> it has the problem that we'd have to do something horrible one time to
> switch to that system, of course, but that seems the 'cleanest' way to
> do it. I'm still not sure it's necessary. I think as Jesse does - any
> time this is broken indicates maintainer error, our work should focus on
> helping maintainers not make errors.
> 

Right, even if you do this horrible hack one day, the very next day we
could have somebody submitting an update for f12 that is a major version
newer than what gets put out on f13 and now you've got an "upgrade" in
the form of a downgrade.  Hope you didn't want to keep that data!

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091122/0353c8d6/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list