[RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 13:48 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> said:
> > Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 09:51 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
> > > 1) I'm going to nag you forever about a problem you can't fix.
> > 
> > This is false, it can get fixed, either with code changes or by dropping
> > the offending package
> 
> Core fonts are not going away, are they? 

The infra no, the fonts (or at least part of them) yes

>  Then why the hate for legacy
> packages using a legacy interface?

The interface is legacy because it didn't work well, and we do not have
users sophisticated enough to undestand their font problems are caused
by their wandering in the legacy minefield land some packagers
recklessly expose.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091123/1e5da2a1/attachment.sig>