Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Tue Nov 24 20:44:39 UTC 2009
Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) said:
> > > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix"
> > > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements
> > > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree
> > > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.)
> >
> > But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and
> > image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it
> > was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'.
>
> SoaS is not Fedora-branded in any way, AFAIK.
Yes, but how often have we touted XO, Sugar, et. al. as being 'based
on Fedora' over the past 4 years? Heck, you could argue it's gotten
more press than some of our official spins.
Bill
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list