Current libgdl induced mess

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Thu Nov 5 15:30:31 UTC 2009


Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) said: 
> Debarshi Ray (debarshi.ray at gmail.com) said: 
> > Actually I had requested a freeze override for Anjuta and libgdl [1]
> > causing the mess. Actually the changes between 2.27.92 to 2.28.0
> > included the addition of an extra enum value to GdlSwitcherStyle and I
> > did not expect this to cause a bump in the soname. But it was bumped
> > and I failed to notice it. My mistake.
> > 
> > This new enum value is not being used as far as I know, so how do you
> > propose we clean this? Untag the new libgdl or rebuild the other
> > packages?
> 
> How many 'other packages' are we referring to here?

Never mind, I see 4 packages.

So:
- I'd rather ship a released version of libgdl
- None of these are critical path

How quickly can you build?

Bill




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list