Broken dependencies script at it again
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Sat Nov 14 22:06:48 UTC 2009
On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com>
wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
>> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> writes:
>>> Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>>> altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it
>>> before it
>>> breaks?
>> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
>> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
>
> Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly
> have broken dependencies.
Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new
future.
--
Jes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091114/0196e7d6/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list