buildsys Broken dependencies - libc

Luya Tshimbalanga luya at fedoraproject.org
Mon Nov 16 08:31:59 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/15/2009 09:37 PM, Arthur G wrote:
> Hi anyonewhocanhelp,
> 
> Just curious, is libc now an explicit dependency or should I buy a
sense of humour? 
> 
> broken dependencies in the development tree:
> On ppc:
>        xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
>        xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6
> ....etc
> 
> Regs, Arthur.
> 

You are not alone, I receives the same broken dependencies for PPC and
PPC64. I wonder if migration for both architecture as "second class" has
occurred in a process.

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya at fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksBDfwACgkQaS6HaNQHFTn31wCePwWtki4IJHQuv0vc2HfPe5nF
V9kAn1O+pGsbFb5w3QD4KawQwgBfHu0S
=Ojqa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list