Broken deps for rawhide the past few days
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Tue Nov 17 22:50:48 UTC 2009
On Nov 17, 2009, at 14:47, Conrad Meyer <cemeyer at u.washington.edu>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning
>>> regarding
>>> broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps
>>> were
>>> broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer
>>> producing
>>> ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config
>>> change
>>> that enacted this on our compose tools. We were attempting to
>>> compose
>>> ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't
>>> work so
>>> hot.
>>>
>>> We should have this fixed today so that future emails about broken
>>> deps
>>> will be about actual broken deps, not broken configurations.
>>> Sorry for
>>> the mailbombing.
>>
>> *sigh*
>>
>> While we were successful in building a new mash package that would
>> avoid
>> making ppc repos, we forgot to update one of the rawhide creation
>> configs so that it used dist-f13 content as opposed to dist-f12.
>> So the
>> rawhide creation process has been using dist-f12 content all this
>> time
>> to build up the chroot, which would then compose dist-f13 content.
>> This
>> means that the dist-f12 version of mash was used, not the dist-f13
>> version we built to disable ppc.
>>
>> I've corrected that. Third try to kill the ppc deps should be the
>> charm.
>
> Could we just not send emails tomorrow, double check that it
> produces the
> correct result, and re-enable them for the next day? In case there's
> something
> else we-shouldn't-have-missed-but-we-did?
>
That's one of the changes I made today.
--
Jes
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list