Old/compat package naming
lkundrak at v3.sk
Fri Nov 20 16:34:40 UTC 2009
Alexander pointed out that I was suggesting a wrong name for Saxon 9
package . In fact there's a couple of packages in repositories now
that violate the naming policy  in the very same way. Apart from
wondering what does Devrim think about renaming the existing saxon
package, I'm wondering what do others (especially the maintainers of
those other packages) think about renaming their packages?
The affected packages are these:
Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs.
-- Stephen Smoogen
More information about the fedora-devel-list