abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 11:32 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
> On 11/25/2009 06:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What do you think of the idea of running the improved duplicate
> > detection logic over existing abrt bug reports in Bugzilla? Would that
> > be feasible, perhaps with some help from the Bugzilla maintainer?
> > Thanks!
> >
> 
> Many backtraces currently stored in bugzilla are damaged (truncated) by 
> a bug (in Linux kernel?). That bug has been fixed, but the backtraces 
> already uploaded with that bug are not parsable by current backtrace parser.
> 
> I haven't figured out how to tweak the parser to handle the damaged 
> backtraces yet. However, I'd like to focus on the new duplication 
> detection mechanism for now, because it is more important from my point 
> of view.

Sure, I agree that would take priority for now.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net