Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)

Björn Persson bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se
Wed Oct 7 19:35:11 UTC 2009


Peter Robinson wrote:
> In fact the proper way to do this it to have the same hardware in the
> group of servers that VMs might be live migrated between so that its
> not an issue. Then the only time this would then come into play is
> when you are upgrading the group/cluster of machines to newer hardware
> and that shouldn't be an issue as the newer hardware should have more
> features in the CPU and not less.

Unless you upgrade from old PowerPC Macs to new Intel Macs. :-)

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091007/f26796bc/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list