rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Oct 13 17:32:28 UTC 2009
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> atropine:~% repoquery --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(xext)'
> libXext-devel-0:1.0.99.4-3.fc12.i686
> atropine:~% repoquery --requires libXext-devel | grep pkg
> pkgconfig
> pkgconfig(x11)
> pkgconfig(xextproto)
>
> So, whatever. Clearly the pkgconfig autorequires are doing the right
> thing: -devel packages that provide a .pc file pick up a Requires:
> pkgconfig. The guidelines should be fixed.
>
Agreed - do you have time to find out when the pkgconfig autoprovides went
into effect and put up a draft on the wiki? Link it to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all Fedora
releases, please move the pkgconfig requires from [LINK] to the EPEL
specific guidelines.
Thanks,
-Tosiho
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091013/83ffc0b3/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list