tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer <cemeyer at u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
> > into dist-f12 provide over having them as updates? (Pushing updates is the
> > suggested approach unless there's some reason it won't work in your case.)
> 
> Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
> Moblin remix spin and allows others to test them rather than me having
> to setup a separate repository so I can test how the interact with the
> rest of the Moblin packages in Fedora.
> 
Does the old network-manager-netbook prevent people from getting onto the
network?  If so, it seems important to make sure the fixed version goes into
the release repositories.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091015/04e7f5d9/attachment.sig>