Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

Tom Lane tgl at redhat.com
Wed Oct 21 22:07:09 UTC 2009


Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com> writes:
> Why not just require a secondary email address?

"Require" a secondary email address?  Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do.  That sounds more like a recipe for driving
maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.

			regards, tom lane




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list