Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

[Milos Jakubicek]

Hi,

On 21.10.2009 20:10, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> * Should we formalize the unwritten policy for Red Hat maintainers who leave
>    the company and don't want to maintain their packages anymore?
>    * Do we need sanity checks to be sure maintainers who do want to keep
>      their packages do so?

I don't think so: in past it was always clear who wants to maintain the 
package further (at least because the maintainer changed his contact 
from @redhat.com to some private address).

>    * Do we want something more generic that covers other compaines that pay
>      their employees to package for Fedora?

I'd rather set now this policy for RH employees (which will cover 99 % 
of cases) than discuss anything like secondary mail addresses and 
various situations which can raise up with other companies for the next 
month. The RH environment is clear to us and easy for manage to you (I 
mean there are no actual problems with handling this within RH), am I right?

Regards,
Milos