Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS (in Rawhide) is about to happen

Steve Dickson SteveD at redhat.com
Mon Oct 26 18:49:46 UTC 2009



On 10/26/2009 02:11 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> That is one of the valid options, but I would think it would better if
>> the server owner did that tweak, than an nfs-utils update, no?
> 
> I'm not suggesting that you do an update that just tweaks config files in
> %post or anything like that.  I'm suggesting you make the out-of-the-box
> behavior with configs people use today do something useful.  Claiming to
> support v4 is not useful if it doesn't really work.
Right... I'm assuming the later... which is exactly how the set the default 
version to v3 in F-12. I install a /etc/nfsmount.conf with Defaultvers=3 set.

But with with older releases I don't messing with people configuration 
files since I would not want to break an existing configuration... 
Note, there is a number of people who are currently running with 
correctly configured v4 server... I would hate to mess those people up.. 

steved.
 




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list