olpc components in x86/x86_64 repo

[Jon Ciesla]

Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2009/10/7 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>:
>   
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
>> <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
>>>> the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be
>>>> essentially a Spin of stock Fedora.  It also helps OLPC devs who don't
>>>> necessarily have XOs.
>>>>         
>>> IIRC, they already are shipping stock Fedora in their latest builds
>>> except for the kernel. They are also responsible for the largest amount
>>> of Fedora deployments in the world. So it is all mutually beneficial.
>>>       
>> That is correct, we're all upstream now with no weird branches for
>> core packages :-)
>>     
>
> Thats great to hear and interesting information. In no way the
> question was meant as criticism. Basically i was just curious if the
> packages are hardware related to the olpc hw or generally  useful.
> Thanks for your answer. Best wishes for the olpc/sugar developers.
> More knowledge and therefor power to the poor kids.
>
>   
<raises beer stein> My thanks to all concerned.

> kind regards,
> Rudolf Kastl
>
>
>   
>> Peter
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>>     
>
>   


-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie