[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: crypto consolidation status?

On 09/28/2009 10:27 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Robert Relyea <rrelyea redhat com> wrote:
>> Currently there are also a half dozen features in mod_nss that aren't in
>> mod_ssl.  SNI is definately something that would be welcomed in NSS, and
>> would probably be implemented by the NSS team itself if it's not
>> contributed first;), particularly if it got added to the list of
>> impediments.
> How does one add to this impediments list? I wasn't sure from the wiki page.
Basically it's bug tracking. Which bugs get pushed depends on how many
packages are affected and
the 'importance' of the package (and the missing feature).

> It is not just the scorecard that's unclear - it was also confusing to
> see Apache marked as "Done (mod_nss ) ".[1] If that's true, what do
> all of these open httpd/apr bugs ([2],[3],[4],[5]) mean?
No, it means the mod_nss has been ported. These fixes are relatively
high on the list, but not yet at the top.

>  On a related
> note, Joe didn't seem too enthusiastic about PHP, either [6].
> - Ken
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347181
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347601
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346541
> [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346551
> [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347911

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]