rpms/libXt/devel .cvsignore, 1.11, 1.12 libXt.spec, 1.33, 1.34 sources, 1.12, 1.13

[Seth Vidal]

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>>   I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
>> those "Requires".
>
> rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
> both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also the pkgconfig(foo) level requirements.
> Maybe the guidelines haven't caught up to this yet?

Probably true.


I'd just like to add a note to Parag: Thanks for reading the package 
commits. It pleases me that people are checking up on various commits that 
go in.

This change in particular seems harmless but it's nice to know there 
are people looking at any commits of any packages.

-sv