tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
> >> Moblin remix spin
> >
> > You can add custom repositories to spin config files, so you could get
> > the updated packages in that way. Not ideal, but it ought to work.
> 
> Already done so, farking painful and the other people that are
> actually using it have borked builds because there was no email about
> the changes to NetworkManager to fedora-devel to allow me to get a
> rebuild done in time. It obviously a "I'm right Jack" situation.

Dan, in future can you let Peter know when you make changes to
NetworkManager which require clients to be rebuilt?

> > As Conrad said, there's no concerted policy here AFAIK, just that no-one
> > yet reached your ticket for some reason.
> 
> Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
> communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
> that it would be complete lock down for core stuff with more
> flexibility for the stuff that obviously isn't mainline and going
> affect the core stability but then then I've not seen communication
> either way so I honestly would have no idea.

I should have said that no-one reached your ticket before the
solid-freeze for the Beta release, I'm not disagreeing with Jesse.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net