Looking into LLVM

[Adam Jackson]

On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 21:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> LLVM 2.6 has been announced with Clang declared as production quality in
> this release
> 
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2009-October/000033.html
> 
> Has anyone been looking into building Fedora with it to see how the
> performance impact is?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the dominating factor in
our performance is the code itself.

Also, last time I checked, llvm's dwarf support was even worse than
gcc's.  No thanks.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091026/0cd44c5f/attachment.sig>