Looking into LLVM

[Adam Jackson]

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/26/2009 08:15 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 19:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 10/26/2009 07:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 21:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> I meant performance, primarily in terms of speed of compilation. Not the
> >> code itself.
> > 
> > Suppose it's faster.  Say even by a factor of 100.  So what?  What
> > problem would that solve?
> 
> The problem of slow compilation? :-)

Which affects who?  koji certainly seems to be keeping up with the load.

What I'm trying to pry out of you is what you'd be hoping to accomplish
by using it.  The answer so far seems to be "I'd spend less time
building things, at the cost of some unknown amount of time invested in
fixing everything to build again".  That doesn't sound like progress.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091026/50a51f18/attachment.sig>