On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
> +%multilib32 sparc sparcv8 sparcv9 sparcv9v ppc s390
> +%multilib64 x86_64 sparc64 sparc64v ppc64 s390x
>
> Remind me what the asymmetry is for here? Why is %{ix86} not in
> %{multilib32} ?
Hm, maybe a stupid question: in what sense are %{ix86} multilib in the first
place?