status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
Ben Boeckel
MathStuf at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 16:50:55 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> At present we are
>> still in the contradictory and unsatisfactory position of
> shipping rsync
>> with an internal forked zlib but refusing to accept zsync
> as a package
>> because it does exactly the same thing.
>
> I hope this would not mean that rsync would be discontinued
> in favour of zsync.
>
> The zsync website states:
>
> "[W]here rsync is designed for synchronising data from one
> computer to another..., zsync is designed for file
> distribution, with one file on a server to be distributed to
> thousands of downloaders."
>
> I use rsync every day for exactly its intended purpose, but I
> have NO use of the latter function.
>
>
FWIW, there's a project here that intends to replace rsync for
all major distro mirrors. I can get more information then. I'll
have him discuss here; he can discuss it's capabilities and
internals much better than I can.
- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=Da7h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list